Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Patel, R. R.
- Marketing of Okra in Banaskantha District of North Gujarat
Abstract Views :325 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 College of Agribusiness Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar Gujarat, IN
2 Integrated Farming Systems, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar , Banaskantha Gujarat, IN
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, C.P. College of Agriculture, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar , Banaskantha Gujarat, IN
1 College of Agribusiness Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar Gujarat, IN
2 Integrated Farming Systems, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar , Banaskantha Gujarat, IN
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, C.P. College of Agriculture, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar , Banaskantha Gujarat, IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 4, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 172-175Abstract
The present study was carried out with a view to estimate the marketing cost, margins, price spread and marketing efficiency for okra grown in Banaskantha district of north Gujarat in the year 2010-11. The conclusion drawn from the study was that the average yield per hectare of okra was estimated to be and 143.90 quintals. The highest disposal was found of April (20.78 %) and lowest was in December (0.65 %). The highest price was in December (Rs. 3200/q) and lowest was in October (Rs. 1073/q). The overall per quintal cost of marketing of okra was estimated to be Rs. 271.50.Among the various cost components, commission charges were 36.83 per cent, grading and packing charges were 16.57 per cent, loading, unloading and weighing charges were 18.41 per cent followed by transportation charges 13.61 per cent of the total marketing costs. The total price spread was observed 39 per cent of consumer's price when produce was sold through wholesalers and retailers. The marketing efficiency estimated for okra was 1.56 for Deesa market in North Gujarat.Keywords
Okra, Marketing, Price Spread- Characterization of Farming System in South Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone of Gujarat
Abstract Views :198 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 AICRP on OFR (S.D. Agricultural University), Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
2 AICRP on IFS, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
3 College of Agri-Business Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Wheat Research Station (S.D.A.U.), Vijapur (Gujarat), IN
1 AICRP on OFR (S.D. Agricultural University), Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
2 AICRP on IFS, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
3 College of Agri-Business Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Wheat Research Station (S.D.A.U.), Vijapur (Gujarat), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 8, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 117-120Abstract
Several Integrated Farming Systems were observed under rain fed as well as irrigated situation in Bharuch and Surat districts of South Gujarat through survey conducted in 144 households through multistage random sampling technique. The study was pertaining the data of the year 2009- 10. Besides this, number of constraints were seen which were faced by the farmers to carry out the systems. The highest per cent of peoples are engaged in sugarcane based farming system with recording 40.28 per cent whereas, lowest in live stock based with having only 1.39 per cent.Keywords
Integrated Farming Systems, Production Constraints, Returns.References
- Baishya, A., Kalita, M.C., Mazumdar, D.K., Hazarika, J.P. and Ahmed, S. (2007). Characterization of farming system in Borpeta and Kamrup districts of lower Brahmputra valley zone of Assam. J. Farming Systems Res. & Development, Modipuram, 3(2): 168-175.
- Kumar, Shalander and Jain, D.K. (2002). Interaction and changes in farming system in semi-arid parts of India: Some issues in sustainability.Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 15(2): 217-230.
- Norman, D.W. (1978). Farming systems research to improve the livelihood of small farmers. American J. Agril. Econ., 60(5):813-818.
- Patel, R.R. (2014). Characterization of farming system in northGujarat agro-climatic zone. Indian J. Ecol., 41(2):349-351.
- Singh, G.B. (1998). Natural resource management for sustainable agriculture in 21st century. Indian Farming, 48(5):7.
- Cultivation and Production Cost of Cumin in Banaskantha District of North Gujarat
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, CPCA, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
2 AICRP-On Farm Research Project, S.D. Agricultural University, Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
3 College of Agri-Business Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Wheat Research Station, S.D.A.U., Vijapur (Gujarat), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, CPCA, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
2 AICRP-On Farm Research Project, S.D. Agricultural University, Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
3 College of Agri-Business Management, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Wheat Research Station, S.D.A.U., Vijapur (Gujarat), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 8, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 138-142Abstract
India produces 70 per cent of global spice production (105100 MT of total production in 2010). In Gujarat state, cumin is grown mostly in the northern district of the state i.e. Mehsana, Banaskantha and Patan district. Cumin was grown under 2,16,000 hectares in Gujarat state, out of this 39897 hectare was contributed by Banaskantha district during the year 2011-12. The aimed of this study was to analyze the cultivation/production cost of cumin and to find return over cost. The study is based on data collected from 108 farmers selected from six villages selected purposively and one regulated market i.e., Tharad of Banaskantha district of Gujarat state. It was calculated that the average total cost of cultivation of cumin was 48905/- Rs. per hectare and net income of cumin was 39852/- Rs. per hectare for the year 2012-2013. The cost of cultivation of cumin for small farmers was higher as compared to medium and large size farmers. Major inputs cost was small farmers contributed 33.09 per cent to total cost of cultivation which was 8.60, 20.34 and 4.15 per cent, for seed, human labour and fertilizer, respectively. The cost of cultivation (cost C2) for small size group of farmers was estimated 55592 Rs. /ha.Keywords
Cumin, Cost of Cultivation Per Hectare, Cost of Production Per Quintal, Gross Return, Net Return.References
- Anonymous (2012). Research Report of the Department of Agricultural Economics for Farm cost Scheme presented and Submitted in the Eighth meeting of Agresco sub-committee of social science.
- Kag, K.D. (1994). Marketing of mustard in Banaskantha district of Gujarat State. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).
- Lal, G. and Mehta, R.S. (2013). An Abstract on “Effect of different packaging materials on post-harvest losses in coriander” published in Book of Abstracts published by National Research Centre Seed Spices. pp. 174.
- Patel, R.M. (2005). Economic analysis of production and marketing of cumin in Banaskantha district in North Gujarat. M.Sc (Ag.) Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).
- Patel, R.R. and Patel, V.M. (2013). An Abstract on “North Gujarat: Cultivation cost of major seed spices crops” published in Book of Abstracts published by National Research Centre Seed Spices. pp. 167.
- Sharma, S. and Singh, I.P. (2013). An Abstract on “An economic analysis of cumin (Cyminum cuminum) production in Jodhpur district of Rajasthan” published in Book of Abstracts Published by National Research Centre Seed Spices. pp. 198.
- A Review on Indian E-Commerce
Abstract Views :298 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 College of Agri Business Management, S.D. Agriculture University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada (Gujarat), IN
2 S.D.A.U., Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
1 College of Agri Business Management, S.D. Agriculture University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada (Gujarat), IN
2 S.D.A.U., Jagudan (Gujarat), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 9, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 247-253Abstract
Electronic commerce (e-commerce) or business is more than just another mode to sustain or boost existing business practices. Rather, electronic commerce is a paradigm shift. It is a disruptive innovation that is drastically altering the traditional approach of performing business. The e-commerce market is thriving and poised for robust growth in Asia, focusing in Indian context than it is showing marvelous business growth for the developing nation. The country has enjoyed exceptional augmentation of almost 50 per cent in the past five years. Although the trend of e-commerce has been making rounds in India for 15 years, the appropriate ecosystem has now started to fall in place. The extensive increase in the number of internet users, growing acceptability of online payments, the proliferation of internet-enabled gadgets and also favourable demographics are the key factors driving the growth story of e-commerce for the developing nation. The number of users making online transactions has been on a rapid growth trajectory and it is expected to grow from 11 million in 2011 to 38 million by the end of 2015. Venture capitalists (VC) and private equity players have demonstrated their confidence in the escalation of e-commerce in the India. This is sufficiently validated by the noteworthy increase in the total investments (US$305 million in 2011 against US$55 million in 2010). The present study has been undertaken to describe the present status and facilitators of e-commerce in India, analyze the present trends of e-commerce in India and examine the barriers of e-commerce in Indian context.Keywords
E-Commerce, E-Business, E-Tailing, Value Proposition.- Major Constraints Faced by Farmers of Sabarkantha District in Gujarat
Abstract Views :186 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 IFS, on Farm Research (S.D.A.U.), Adiya, Patan (Gujarat), IN
2 All India Co-Ordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems (S.D.A.U.), S.K. Nagar (Gujarat), IN
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of A.B.M., (S.D.A.U.), S.K. Nagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Dry Farming Research Station (S.D.A.U.), Radhanpur (Gujarat), IN
1 IFS, on Farm Research (S.D.A.U.), Adiya, Patan (Gujarat), IN
2 All India Co-Ordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems (S.D.A.U.), S.K. Nagar (Gujarat), IN
3 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of A.B.M., (S.D.A.U.), S.K. Nagar (Gujarat), IN
4 Dry Farming Research Station (S.D.A.U.), Radhanpur (Gujarat), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 9, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 133-136Abstract
An attempt was made to study the major constraints of farmers of sabarkantha district. Out of 13 block one high productive and one low productive block were selected purposively. Three villages from each block were selected randomly making the sample size of 321. The constraints were worked out by using Garrett’s Ranking Technique. The major constraints faced by the farmers were lack of technical advice/know-how, non-availability of farm credit, lack of improved variety suitable to region, lack of irrigation water, high cost of inputs, inadequate/irregular supply of electricity, scarcity of farm labour, social factors (adopting piggery/poultry), and problems of pigs. The major constraints faced by the farmers in the studied area of the district were ranked using Garrett’s ranking technique and found that problem of pigs and bluebull (Nilgay) ranked 1st, High cost of input (seed/fertilizer/pesticides. etc) ranked 2nd, Lack of technical advice/know-how ranked 3rd.Keywords
Farmers, Garrett’s Ranking Technique.References
- Baria, P. A., Soni, N.V. and Patel, D.D. (2013). Constraints faced by the mango growers towards scientific cultivation in mango orchards. Gujarat J. Extn. Edu., 24 (2) : 123-124.
- Chaudhary, Diptesh and Chauhan, N.M. (2016). Constraints faced by biofertilizer users. Gujurat J. Extn. Edu., 27 (1) : 49-52
- Dharandel, A.A., Bhatt, P.M. and Patel, N.P. (2011). Constraints faced by cotton growers in management of cotton cultivation. Gujarat J. Extn. Edu., 22 (2) : 80-82.
- Hosmath, J.A. (2012). A survey analysis on advantages and constraints of Bt cotton cultivation in northern Karnataka. Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci., 25 (1) : 140-141.
- Patel, R.R., Thakkar, K.A., Bindage, A.B. and Patel, V.M. (2013). Constraints of vegetable growers in north Gujarat.Gujarat J. Extn. Edu., 24 (2) : 68-73.
- Prajapati, V.V., Gohil, C.A. and Tunvar, M.A. (2016). Constraints faced by farmers in purchase of agro-chemicals in vegetable crops. Gujarat J. Extn. Edu., 27 (1) : 63-66.
- Reddy, Mohan, S. and Reddy, Prathapa, B. (2017). Constraints in production and marketing of papaya in Kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh. Internat. Res. J. Agric. Econ & Statist., 8(1) : 72-74.
- Sharma, Y.K., Bangarva, G.S. and Sharma, S.K. (2008). Farming system based constraints faced by farmers. Indian. Res.J. Extn. Edu., 8 (1) : 57-59.
- In vitro Evaluation of Fungicides and Organic Extracts against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Isolated from Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (l.) Millsp.]
Abstract Views :338 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
D. M. Pathak
1,
R. R. Patel
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University,Campus Bharuch, Maktampur (Gujarat), IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University,Campus Bharuch, Maktampur (Gujarat), IN
Source
International Journal of Plant Protection, Vol 12, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 147-151Abstract
Ten fungicides at three different concentrations were screened in vitro by poisoned food technique for evaluating their efficacy against M. phaseolina, in which mancozeb (dithane M-45, 75% WP), carbendanzim (bavistin, 50% WP), carbendanzim + mancozeb (sixer, 75%WP) and metalexyl 18% + mancozeb 64% (ridomil, 75% WP) were proved to be highly toxic to the growth of the M. phaseolina. Eight different organic extracts were tested against M. phaseolina by poisoned food technique with different concentration in vitro. All the extracts were inhibitory to M. phaseolina significantly lower mycelium growth was recorded in Neem cake followed by coconut. Next best were FYM, mustard cake, sesamum cake and vermicompost. While lowest inhibition of mycelial growth of M. phaseolina was observed in groundnut cake and castor cake.Keywords
Fungicides, Pigeonpea, Organic Extracts.References
- Agrawal, S.C. (1993). Disease of green gram and black gram international book distributors, pp. 1-2, 5, 28, 32-33, 159, 181, 269.
- Chavan, R.V. (2006). Investigation on ischolar_main rot (Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh (Gujarat) India.
- Dhingani, C.J. (2011). Management of ischolar_main rot disease (Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under south gujarat conditions. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Navsari Agril. University, Navsari (Gujarat) India.
- Jaiman, R.K., Jain, S.C. and Sharma, P. (2009). Field evaluation of fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments against ischolar_main rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in cluster bean. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 39(1): 74-76.
- Kannaiyan, J., Nene, Y.L., Reddy, M.V., Rayan, J.G. and Raju, T.N. (1984). Prevalence of pigeonpea diseases and associated crop losses in Asia, Africa and the Americas. Trop. J. Pest Management., 30(2): 62-71.
- Lambhate, S.S., Chaudhari, G.K., Mehetre, S.S. and Zanjare, S.R. (2002). In vitro evaluations of chemicals against ischolar_main rot of cotton caused by M. phaseolina. J. Maharashtra Agril. Uni., 21(1): 99-100.
- Nakarni, N.R. (1991). Investigation on Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid., causing ischolar_main rot of castor. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, S.K. Nagar (Gujarat) India.
- Naz, F., Rauf, C.A., Haque, I.U. and Ahmad, I. (2006). Management of Rhizoctonia solani with plant diffusates and chemicals. Pak. J. Phytopathol., 18(1): 36-43.
- Nene, Y.L., Sheila, V.K. and Sharma, S.B. (1984). A world list of chickpea and pigeonpea pathogens. 5th Edn., Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh., India: International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics.
- Nene, Y.L., Sheila, V.K. and Sharma, S.B. (1989). A world list of chickpea (Cicer arirtinum L.) and Pathology progress Report-7. Patancheru, A. P., India: ICRISAT, pp. 23.
- Vincent, J.M. (1947). Distortion of fungal hyphae in presence of certain inhibitors. Nature, 150: 850.
- WEBLIOGRAPHY
- DAC (2011). Fourth advance estimates of production of Food grains for 2010-11. Agricultural statistics division, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Government of India, New Delhi (http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/advance_estimate/3rdadvance_estimates_2010-2011 (english). Pdf, accessedon August 10, 2011).
- FAO (2008). http://faostat fao.org/